Let the Forest Service know Peak 6 isn't the answer.

Rick Warren
Executive Committee Chair
Blue River Group

On June 11, 2011 , the United States Forest Service (USFS) released their Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)¹, which was prepared to analyze and disclose the estimated environmental effects of implementation of the Breckenridge Ski Resort (BRS) Peak 6 Project. BSR is located on the White River National Forest in Summit County, CO.

The proposed Peak 6 development encompasses approximately 550 acres of lift-served and hike-to skiing. The terrain would be accessed by a proposed six-person lift, and by traversing from the existing Imperial Express to the north. In addition, two facilities would be constructed to accommodate guests.

Breckenridge Ski Area Peak 6 Expansion

Prevent loss of critical habitat at Breckenridge Ski Area!

Take Action!

The purpose and statement of need given that support the Peak 6 Proposed Alternative 2 solution all boil down to a single reason: to address over-crowding of lift lines at Breckenridge Ski Resort (BSR)². But shrewd observers know that over-crowding here is not a function of too few skiable acres. Rather, it is a function of two factors: marketing and ineffective movement of skiers on existing terrain.

Skier congestions at ski-lifts do not justify cutting down old growth trees. BSR should first follow through on upgrading 6 chair, which was approved six years ago. These would actually meet the purpose and need.

Support Alternative #1! Yes to Alternative 1 means yes, we will continue to have the choice of how best to use this beautiful area for the years to come. It's called Alternative 1 because our first choice, our first responsibility, should always be to preserve our valued resources until there is a clear and overwhelming need to exploit them, to cut these trees down, which simply does not exist now. BSR should make improvements to existing lifts and add additional runs within the existing Peak 7, 8, 9, and 10 for expansion purposes.

Take action now by sending a message to Scott Fitzwilliams, White River National Forest Supervisor, to support the DEIS Alternative 1 "No Action."

¹June 2011 Breckenridge Ski Resort Peak 6 Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)

²With the development of the proposed Peak 6 lift and associated terrain, the "Comfortable Carrying Capacity" at BSR would increase by 1,100 guests to 16,020 guests. A Forest Plan Amendment is proposed to amend the 2002 Forest Plan Standard. Three alternatives are analyzed in detail in the Draft EIS: Alternative 1 (No Action), Alternative 2 (the Proposed Action), and Alternative 3.

Home | Contact Us | En Español | Terms and Conditions of Use | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Website Help

Sierra Club® and "Explore, enjoy and protect the planet"® are registered trademarks of the Sierra Club. © Sierra Club 2015.
The Sierra Club Seal is a registered copyright, service mark, and trademark of the Sierra Club.