February 26, 2015 - Plastic Bags Everywhere: Tell Your Senators to vote NO on SB 139
SB 139, Plastic Bags Everywhere, is up for a vote of the State Senate today. The vote is expected between noon and 1 p.m. SB 139 would stop any kind of regulation of plastic bags by local governments. The first version would likely have even prevented local recycling ordinances. Tybee Island, Athens-Clarke County and Fulton County are considering regulation of plastic bags. This bill could also interfere with the Atlanta Airport's recycling and composting plans.
Please take a few minutes this morning and call your state senator and urge him or her to vote NO on SB 139. If you do not know who your Senator is, use our "Find Your Legislator" Tool at the bottom of this page. Please see the talking points below:
TALKING POINTS ON SB 139 (Vote NO!)
Facts about Plastic Bags:
- Americans use and dispose of 100 billion plastic
shopping bags each year and at least 12 million barrels of oil are used per
year in the manufacture of those plastic bags (Source: Wall Street Journal). It is in our national security interest to
reduce our dependence upon foreign oil – and plastic bags.
- The average American family takes home almost 1,500
plastic shopping bags a year (Source: www.nrdc.org)
- Less than 5% of plastic grocery bags are recycled
in the U.S. (Source: US EPA)
- Plastic bags can take up to 1,000 years to break
down (and they never fully decompose, they just break into smaller and smaller
pieces). Since they don’t decompose,
plastic bags end up in rivers, lakes, and oceans. Plastic bags in the ocean are a huge hazard
to marine life. The bags can be
swallowed, wrapped around the necks or find of animals and poison the waters
around them as they leach chemicals into the water.
- Giant islands of plastic bags have been seen
floating in the Pacific Ocean for years, the largest of which is the size of
Texas. Unless our reliance on plastic
bags decrease, it will continue to grow, acting as a trap for fish and sea
dwelling animals, as well as destroying entire ecosystems.
- At least 267 different species are known to have
suffered from entanglement or ingestion of plastic marine debris
- In marine environments, many animals confuse
plastic bags for jellyfish or other food.
Sea turtles are especially vulnerable.
Bags will increase costs to retailers
Change is hard, but ultimately this is better for the economy. Who cleans the plastic bags out of sewers,
rivers, and oceans? It’s taxpayer money.
Also, if plastic bags aren’t provided at the checkout, consumers will
start using their own reusable bags.
This will save retailers money.
need a patchwork of confusing ordinances:
- Home Rule is a long-established policy in Georgia
whereby local governments can decide how to best govern themselves. Coastal communities like Tybee Island have an
interest in protecting marine life from entanglement in plastic bags and
preserving the beauty of their beaches from plastic bag debris and other
litter. Our local communities should
have the freedom to enact ordinances unique to their concerns without the state
meddling unnecessarily in their affairs.
- There are many policies that vary across the state,
such as localities that don’t allow alcohol sales. If we’re going to restrict plastic bag
ordinances, why not also require that every community in Georgia sell alcohol
so we can have uniform alcohol laws?
- The reality is that only a handful of communities
are likely to pass plastic bag ordinances – they have only been considered by
Tybee, Athens, and Decatur in recent years.
This is not going to create mass confusion. We should respect home rule authority.
We need a cultural shift away from our use-and-toss culture, which costs
us money and harms the environment. Each
reusable bag can eliminate hundreds (if not thousands) of plastic bags.
February 20, 2015 - Georgia Water Coalition Update
The Georgia Sierra Club is a member of the Georgia Water Coalition, a group of more than 200 organizations representing well over a quarter of a million Georgians. Check out their latest legislative update on water issues!
In this issue:
- Legislative Tracker
- How to Stay Engaged: Sign-up for Protect Georgia
GWC Legislative Tracker
As of Friday, February 20, the General Assembly will have convened for 19 days of the 40-day 2015 session. The General Assembly will convene again February 23 through February 26 (Days 20 through 23). The reminder of the session’s schedule has been set and can be found here.
SB 36 and HB 116: Protect Our Well Water
Two bills have been introduced—SB 36 and HB 116—to prohibit the practice of aquifer storage and recovery in the Floridan aquifer in eleven coastal counties.
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) is the practice of injecting chemically treated wastewater, surface water or groundwater down into an aquifer with the intent to withdraw it later. Since 1999, the General Assembly repeatedly imposed a moratorium on ASR to protect drinking water in 11 coastal Georgia counties. However, in 2014 that protection was lost because the moratorium expired. Fortunately, several legislators across south Georgia have recognized this mistake. To resolve the situation, they introduced SB 36 and HB 116 to institute a permanent ban of ASR on the Georgia coast.
Over the past month, the Brantley, Bryan and Camden County commissions, and the Liberty Regional Water Resources Council have passed four individual resolutions opposing the injection of chemically treated water into the Floridan aquifer.
STATUS: The Senate Natural Resources & the Environment committee discussed SB 36 for a second time, and the bill was tabled on agreement between the bill’s sponsor, Senator William Ligon and committee Chair Senator Ross Tolleson. HB 116 has been referred to the House Natural Resources & Environment committee.
ACTION NEEDED: Please contact Governor Nathan Deal and Lt. Governor Casey Cagle and ask that they work with the General Assembly to enact legislation to protect wells and drinking water in Georgia.
Please thank the Senators and Representatives who introduced SB 36 or HB 116 for their willingness to protect the Floridan Aquifer. Encourage other legislators to either sign on to one of the bills or at least support the proposals when the bills come to their committee or for a floor vote.
SB 101: Restore the Coastal Buffer
SB 101 was introduced this week to restore coastal marsh buffer protections that were lost on Earth Day 2014 after an Environmental Protection Division policy change. SB 101 establishes a 25-foot buffer in the Erosion and Sedimentation Act to protect coastal marshlands from sediment pollution. GWC representatives actively participated in a negotiation over SB 101’s language. Unfortunately, we were not given the chance to review final language before the bill was filed. While we agree with most of the language in the bill, the GWC is working to clarify some of the provisions, exemptions and definitions.
STATUS: Sen. Ben Watson has sponsored the bill with five other senators—not all of the sponsors are from the coast. SB 101 has been assigned to the Senate Natural Resources & the Environment committee.
ACTION NEEDED: Please contact your Senators and ask them to support a marsh buffer bill that does not include blanket exemptions for maintenance projects or for federally permitted projects.
How to Stay Engaged: Sign-up for action alerts with Protect Georgia
GWC partners and members can stay up to date on proposals affecting clean water, the health of our rivers and Georgia’s vital natural resources by signing-up to receive action alerts from Protect Georgia throughout the legislative session. Membership to Protect Georgia, formerly known as the Georgia Environmental Action Network (GEAN), is free and allows you to easily contact your senator, representative or other decision maker via e-mail when an important vote is scheduled. Please visit http://www.protectgeorgia.org/
February 20, 2015 - Update of Georgia Chapter Positions
The Legislative Committee has taken the following positions:
- SUPPORT HB 213 - Introduced by Rep. Mike Jacobs, this bill would permanently remove the 50/50 handcuffs on MARTA spending. Right now, MARTA must spend 50% of its income on capital expenses and 50% on operating expenses. This is something we have advocated for for several years.
- OPPOSE HB 284 - Introduced by Rep. Harry Geisinger, this bill establishes a "loser pays" provision for any action against the gas or electric utilities. This bill died quickly two years ago when it was sent to the House Judiciary Committee for review. This time, the bill has been assigned to the House Energy Committee, which may be more friendly to it.
- OPPOSE HB 160 - Introduced by Rep. Emory Dunahoo, this bill would reverse many years of state policy by allowing raccoon trapping in north Georgia. The Chapter's Wildlands and Wildlife Committee has requested that we take a position against this bill. The Sierra Club adopted a more aggressive policy against leg holdtraps a couple of years ago, mainly due to concerns about it being inhumane.
- OPPOSE HB 255 - Introduced by Rep. Mike Cheokas. The Georgia Forestry Association has been complaining for many years that southern pine timber is not treated fairly under the Green Building Council LEED standards. This bill would pass a law changing the standard, which threatens our pines here in Georgia.
- AMEND SB 101 - This is the marsh buffer fix bill and introduced by Senator Doctor Watson. Many of you recall the EPD's infamous Earth Day 2014 decision to remove the marsh buffers. Initially, we thought that the compromise language developed with EPD was going to be good for all parties. Unfortunately, at the last minute, attorneys for the GA Home Builders Association came in with a long list of additional exemptions and presented them to Senator Watson. Several meetings ensued and many bad exemptions were taken out. Our coalition attorneys have identified three amendments to improve the bill and we will continue to work to amend SB 101.
February 19, 2015 - Promising Compromise Bill for EVs Passes
On Wednesday, February 18th at 2 p.m. an Income Tax Subcommittee of House Ways & Means meeting convened, and a hearing was held on just 4 bills dealing with electric vehicles.
The hearing began with a brief discussion about Chairman Parsons' bill, HB 200. This bill would change the amount of the tax credit for installation of electric & alternative fuel vehicle chargers. BOMA testified in favor of the bill, since they are getting more requests for charging stations; however, they cost approximately $25,000 each. They caimed that without the credit, installing these chargers is hard to justify. Steve Draper of GA Power agreed, stating that they were fine with the BOMA language in the bill, but wanted to keep utilities in as well since GA Power is putting in 25 or more stations a year and not charging for the electricity while they are building the infrastructure.
HB 122 by Rep. Chuck Martin was next up. Rep. Martin's bill would eliminate the tax credit effective July 1st. The reasoning given was that the credit has been available for 17 years, and given the pace of EV technology, this credit is an outdated policy. "It's done its job," Rep. Martin declared as he noted that the credit is costing the state $50 million a year. Rep. Martin indicated that we need to give the House members a chance to clean this off the books before we look at other options. In addition to proposing this in HB 122, it has also been inserted into the Transportation Funding Act, HB 170. However, comments from committee members pushed back on the need to abruptly end the tax credit, citing it was too extreme. Instead all agreed on the need for a cap and sunset.
HB 176 by Rep. Tommy Benton was briefly considered before moving on to HB 220 by Rep. Ben Harbin. His bill expands the types of vehicles eligible for the credit and institutes a sunset date, making Rep. Martin's bill largely unnecessary. Several speakers commented in favor of HB 220, including the 34th Commandant of the United States Marine Corps General James Conway, retired. General Conway stressed that his support for EVs was not environmental in nature; instead, his concerns center around the fact that the U.S. is the largest consumer of oil and our dependence is a national security issue. Don Frances of Clean Cities Georgia, Eric Henning of General Motors and Susan Berryman Rodriguez of Mothers and Others for Clean Air were the others to speak in favor of the bill.
The meeting on Wednesday ended with a favorable leaning toward HB 220, which was confirmed at Thurday's 3 p.m. meeting of the same committee. Initially, Rep. Martin presented HB 122 and the measure passed 7-6. Luckily, Chairman Jay Powell, Minority Leader Abrams, Majority Whip Matt Ramsey, and Sam Teasley entered the room. A parliamentary problem was noted: Rep. Martin was informed that he is not on the Income tax subcommittee so he was not eligible to vote for HB 122. The motion therefore failed, 6-5. On a second "do pass" vote, HB 122 fails 7-8.
- Voting YES: Tom Rice, Goeff Duncan, Trey Kelly, BJ Pak , BrettHarrell, Majority Whip Matt Ramsey, Sam Teasley, (not 100% sure onthis- Bruce Wiilliamson didn't vote? Pak left at some point.
- Voting NO: Sharon Beasley-Teague, Bob Bryant, Ron Stephens, MickeyStephens, Virgil Fludd, Ben Harbin, Minority Leader Stacey Abrams, Chairman Jay Powell
Harbin's HB 220 is motioned for a "do pass" vote. Despide Trey Kelly's failed motion for an amendment to cut the total tax credit from $150 million to $30 million, HB 220 passed the subcommittee. Now it heads to the full Ways and Means Committee. While the Georgia Sierra Club would prefer to keep the credits intact, if the credits must be reformed, then phasing them out rather than ending them abruptly is the favorable option.
February 18, 2015 - Still not enough transit in HB 170
HB 170 was reported on favorably by the House Transportation Committee after a meeting held at 3:30 pm on Wednesday, Feb. 18th. The version approved at the meeting changes the original plan to eliminate local governments' ability to collect taxes on the sale of motor fuel and instead let them charge excise taxes up to 6 cents per gallon.
The new version of the bill would let cities, counties and school districts keep collecting local option sales taxes (E-LOSTS and SPLOSTS) to fund specific priority lists as they have been. However, after the current taxes expire, whatever percentage of the tax that comes from motor fuel would have to be spent on transportation-related projects, including: capital and operations for roads, streets, bridges, rail, buses, airports, public transit, and services necessary to access transportation infrastructure including the repayment of general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, and other multi-year obligations. Other local taxes, including the HOST and LOST, would no longer apply to motor fuel and instead the taxes would increase from 1 percent to 1.25 percent to cover any potential loss in revenue.
State sales taxes on motor fuel will still be phased out, and a new state excise tax on fuel of 29.2 cents per gallon would be created. The most offensive parts of the new version include a new annual registration fee on electric vehicles of $200 to $300, and the elimination of a $5,000 state tax credit for electric cars.
As we stated in our press release below, this bill does very little for transit, biking and walkability in its current form. The provision to use EV user fees on transit projects has been struck from the bill, as does any language saying that funds raised from excise taxes may be spent on mass transit, bike, and pedestrian projects. The only money mentioned in the bill that is specified to go towards transit involves a promise to issue a $100 million bond for transit in the upcoming budgeting process. We need more certainty! The bill is now headed to House Rules for scheduling, where its next stop will be on the house floor for debate.
February 18, 2015 - Capitol Conservation Day success!
The Georgia Water Coalition hosted its annual Capitol Conservation Day on Wednesday, February 18th. Thanks to all who lobbied their legislators in favor of Georgia's environment!! We had a great turnout and flooded the Capitol halls to advocate for protection of the Floridian Aquifer and restoration of Coastal Marsh Buffers. Governor Nathan Deal also joined us on the steps to snap a photo with our group. Check out our photos below!
"It was wonderful to experience lobbying at the capital with you, Bettye, Karen, Woody, Brionté, Maria, Neill and all the other wonderful people I met! I will definitely recommend this experience to others in the LaGrange group for the future. The food was excellent as were the briefings. My friend Lisa and I were able to meet with 2 senators and speak with 1 representative on the phone soon after the house adjourned at noon. Two of them were in support of protecting the Floridian Aquifer by banning ASR and also were opposed to the Transportation bill 170 as it now stands. One was silent. I will write him. None of them were familiar with SB 101 to protect the marsh buffers, but said they would look it up!" - Laura Breyfogle, Chair of the LaGrange Group of the Georgia Chapter
Click here to view more photos on the Georgia Chapter's Flickr page!
February 11, 2015 - Still Time to Fix Transportation Funding Bill
Still Time to Fix HB 170
Georgia Sierra Club Cautions That Without Needed Changes, Bill Will Lead to Worsened Congestion, Continued Deferred Maintenance, Little for Transit
ATLANTA, GA -- The Georgia Chapter of the Sierra Club called on the Georgia General Assembly Wednesday to make substantial, ongoing funding for transit a centerpiece of the proposed Transportation Funding Act of 2015. Although sponsors have make some changes to the bill, it currently does not include a significant funding stream for mass transit or other alternatives to sitting in traffic.
“Support for transit in Georgia is at an all-time high,” said David Emory, Georgia Chapter Chair. “Clayton County residents voted to join MARTA with a historic 74 percent in favor, and recent polling in the 10-County Atlanta region shows transit garnering more support than any other option, including road expansion. With H.B. 170, legislators have a critical opportunity to craft a truly balanced funding plan that reflects Georgians’ growing demand for real transportation choices.”
H.B. 170 would add roughly $1 billion in annual transportation funding by reallocating existing state and local revenues to a consolidated state excise tax on gasoline, which under current law would be dedicated to spending on roads and bridges. Unless legislators act to correct this imbalance, the new revenue would go overwhelmingly to road expansion, worsening sprawl and congestion and denying Georgians the transportation options they deserve.
“The bill as currently written squanders a chance to bring long-overdue balance to state transportation funding,” said Georgia Chapter lobbyist Neill Herring. “Legislators should seize this opportunity to finally fix the dedication issue and open the gas tax to all transportation purposes.”
For the Sierra Club to support HB 170 the following changes would need to be made:
- Open the state gasoline tax, currently dedicated to roads and bridges, to all transportation purposes, following the model of states like Colorado.
- Establish criteria for road spending that prioritizes system preservation and maintenance over expansion, giving Georgians some assurance that the spending would go toward the greatest need.
- Treat alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) fairly. Address the phase-out of the EV tax credit elsewhere and bring any annual AFV fee in line with what the average motorist pays in gas taxes (currently estimated at $85, not $200 or $300).
While Georgia debates its transportation future, other states are actively building the multimodal networks that residents and businesses increasingly demand. North Carolina, Texas and Florida have all made substantial investments in statewide rail that benefit both freight and passengers, connecting cities and rural areas and improving mobility for residents statewide.
“Georgia is in danger of being left at the station when it comes to multimodal transportation,” said Georgia Chapter Director Colleen Kiernan. “While neighboring states like Florida and North Carolina build the statewide transit networks necessary to thrive in the 21st-century economy, Georgia remains stuck in the past with an outdated roads-only policy.”
In addition to providing a meaningful state revenue stream for transit, H.B. 170 can be further improved through fair treatment for drivers of fuel-efficient vehicles. As written, the bill would impose punitively high fees on drivers of alternative-fuel vehicles, and would also abruptly end a popular tax credit for electric vehicles. Environmental advocates have joined vehicle manufacturers and electric utilities to support a compromise bill, H.B. 220, that would phase out the EV credit gradually.
“Instead of punishing Georgians who choose to drive more efficient and sustainable vehicles, legislators should adopt an equitable policy that is in line with those in other states.” said Georgia Chapter Transportation Organizer Brionte McCorkle. “These changes, together with a truly balanced and multimodal approach to state transportation funding, will result in a bill that a broad coalition of Georgians, including environmental advocates, can support.”
About the Georgia Sierra Club
The Sierra Club is Georgia’s largest grassroots environmental advocacy organization. The Georgia Chapter has long been at the forefront of sustainable transportation policy, providing critical early support for the Atlanta BeltLine project, standing up against dangerous proposals such as the Northern Arc expressway, and playing a leading role in the recent successful expansion of MARTA into Clayton County.
February 9, 2015 - Solar Freedom Bill passes!
The Georgia House of Representative passed the Solar Feedom bill, HB 57, by a 165-0 vote. House Bill 57, The Solar Free-Market Financing Act, will allow Georgia homeowners, businesses, and schools who want to install solar panels on their property to finance those projects instead coming with the tens of thousands out of pocket. The bill now goes to the Senate where it will be assigned to a committee for futher consideration. Thanks to everyone who took action urging their Representatives to vote Yes! Stay tuned for updates and an opportunity to encourage your Senators to vote yes on the bill as well.
For more information about Third-Party Solar Financing, click here.
February 8, 2015 - Update of Georgia Chapter Positions
The Legislative Committee has taken the following positions:
- OPPOSE the budget item in the budget for Fiscal Year 2016, proposed by the Governor which zeroes out the Soil and Water Commission as an independent agency and moves most of the jobs to the Deptartment of Agriculture. This proposal also moves the soil and water dams to the Georgia Environmental Protection Division.
- SUPPORT HB 57 - Introduced by Rep. Mike Dudgeon (R-Johns Creek), the Solar Free-Market Financing Act will allow Georgia homeowners, businesses, and schools who want to install solar panels on their property to finance those projects rather than paying in full, out of pocket.
- SUPPORT HB 59 - This is the sovereign immunity fix introduced by the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Wendell Willard (R-Sandy Springs).
- OPPOSE SB 59 - Introduced by Senator Hunter Hill, this bill is another bad public-private partnership bill.
- OPPOSE HB 75 - This bill cuts the funding for two jobs in the Georgia Soil and Water Commission FY 2015 supplemental budget.
- SUPPORT HB 116 - Introduced by Rep. Alex Atwood (R-Brunswick) and SUPPORT SB 36 by Senator William Ligon (R-Brunswick). These are identical bills re-establishing the moratorium on ASR in the Floridan aquifer in 11 coastal counties.
- OPPOSE HB 122 - Introduced by Rep. Chuck Martin (R- north Fulton) repeals the state tax credit for electric vehicles effective July 1st, 2015.
- OPPOSE HB 170 - This is a "the Smash and Grab" transportation funding bill. Please stay tuned for a longer description of our opposition.
- SUPPORT HB 220 - Introduced by Rep. Ben Harbin, this bill would amend the current state tax credit for Electric Vehicles. This bill would reduce the tax credit to $2,500 or $2,000 depending on the vehicle, and will expand the number of qualifying vehicles. By 2020, the credit will be phased out.
January 2015 - Georgia Chapter Legislative Priorities
The 2015 Georgia Legislative Session has started, and already, the bills are rolling out. The Georgia Chapter's Legislative Committee is tasked with establishing our legislative priorities and deciding our position on bills in each category. Below are the priorities the committee has approved:
2015 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITY ISSUES
Our Smart Energy Solutions is working to help our communities transition to a lasting clean energy economy. This legislative session we will support efforts to secure affordable clean energy, powered by Georgia's ample solar and wind resources.
- SUPPORT HB 57 by Rep. Mike Dudgeon (R-Johns Creek). This bill makes itclear that third party ownership of rooftop solar panels with thesolar power generated used to pay off a lease is legal in Georgia.
Transportation has been identified as the number one issue facing the Georgia legislature this year. Last year, a Joint Study Committee on Critical Transportation Infrastructure Funding was formed and convened meetings all accross the state. We presented our vision for transportation here in Georgia and will work to promote that vision.
- SUPPORT funding for transit and commuter rail. This might be opening the 4th penny of the state sales tax on motor fuel to anytransportation use or something else. We will once again join MARTA in supporting permanent elimination of the 50/50 capital/operatingsales tax split.
We are a member of the Georgia Water Coalition. The coalitons main priority this year is to extend the ASR ban in the coastal counties. Additionally, we will:
- SUPPORT SB 36 by Senator William Ligon (R-Brunswick)
- GA Water Coalition priority Restore the buffer protection for saltmarshes. The EPD compromise bill may be introduced by Senator Watson
- OPPOSE ROLLBACKS
- OPPOSE proposal to abolish the GA Soil and Water Commission and moveits duties to Dept of Ag and EPD, This bad idea is once again in theproposed budget.
- OPPOSE attempts to keep the 6th edition of the Green Book (for erosioncontrol) from going into use.
- OPPOSE attempts to do away with the state tax credit for electric vehicles (EVs)
- OPPOSE any attempts to denounce or derail the EPA's Clean Power Plan